Has anyone else notice how the luster is gone from the Internet? While there are a few things that still interest me (the blogs I read being at the top) the Internet has become as close to a pure "utility" as you get.
I can check sports scores, yay. I can read the news, awesome. I can google lyrics to crappy 70's one hit wonders, yippee. Email is handy, sweet.
I remember when the web first hit the masses over a decade ago. I actually worked for a large online company back then called Prodigy. Many of you may remember it and may have even owned an account. It was exciting back then. Now it's like that DVD you bought a year ago that was good when you got it, but you aren't going go too far out of your way to watch it now. Or that girlfriend you had in high school that was knock out, but now you can't stand to hear her talk. Or maybe like McDonald's hamburgers. They were a staple when you were younger but now, while you can get full on them, they make you want to hurl even smelling them. Ok, maybe it's not that bad.
But it kinda bums me. I used to be excited by what all was out there. Now I feel like I've seen it all.
So come on people, tell me what still turns you on out there on the interwebs. What do you find entertaining? What is worth our time?
Politicians and Charity
I know that politicians of every stripe can be stingy, but I am about to pick on one in particular. I am picking on him because I see a little hypocrisy and he happens to be in the news.
Barack Obama talks a lot about the poor and the disadvantaged, as does his wife. He is quick to cite his "community activism". He is a champion of the oppressed. We can do it!
Well, it seems when it comes to charity, I guess we can't do it. It turns out that he and his wife haven't been so charitable in spite of doing very well for themselves.
From 2001-2004 he and his wife made about a million dollars. Not bad. However, their charitable giving over that period was about %1.0. Yes, about $10,000 of their million dollars went to charity.
They did give more after he sold a fortune in books over the following 3 years and that average jumped all the way up to %3.8.
Can anyone really respect a guy who wants to take more of our hard earned money and give it to the needy when he can't even do it out of his own pocket? This is one of the problems with proponents of socialist policies. For the most part they are not generous people.
And as an aside, this shows us the difference between socialism and the system we see the early church set up in the New Testament. It was based on freely giving to one another. Socialism on the other hand, in most every form we have seen, is based on taking from one to give to another. And that just doesn't work. The spirit of giving is essentially destroyed.
In this respect, Obama is just living up to who he is. He has no more inclination to "share all things in common" than the richest, tightest, conservative oil tycoon. He just wants the rest of us to do it via taxes.
Unfortunately, we'll never hear liberals own up to the fact that Obama's giving record is a problem. And that shows us who many of them really are...
Posted at 11:26 PM in Political Commentary | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBack (0)
| Reblog (0)